PromptHero
← Back to Blog

Impact of Google’s March 2025 Core Update on AI Website’s Organic Traffic

How Google’s Latest SEO Update is killing your AI platform’s traffic Overview of the March 2025 Core Update Google’s March 2025 Core Update rolled out from March 13 to March 27, 2025 – a 14-day rollout for the first broad core algorithm update of 2025 (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). Google […]

Impact of Google’s March 2025 Core Update on AI Website’s Organic Traffic

How Google’s Latest SEO Update is killing your AI platform’s traffic

Overview of the March 2025 Core Update

Google’s March 2025 Core Update rolled out from March 13 to March 27, 2025 – a 14-day rollout for the first broad core algorithm update of 2025 (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). Google described it as a “typical” core update aimed at improving search result relevance and overall content quality (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). Many SEO tracking tools reported notable turbulence in mid-to-late March as the update took effect. Sistrix’s volatility radar, for example, showed SERP fluctuations spiking around March 18 and again near the end of the rollout on March 27 (Google Core Update March 2025 – SISTRIX). This indicates the timeline when ranking changes likely hit websites (yours included).

(Google Core Update March 2025 – SISTRIX) Google’s Update Radar (UK Mobile data) shows a surge in search result volatility during the March 13–27, 2025 Core Update rollout. The spike around 18.03.2025 and again on 27.03.2025 reflects the periods of highest ranking turbulence.

Public communication from Google was sparse on specifics, beyond confirming the rollout completion on March 27 (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). However, SEO analysts and data providers noted that this core update’s overall volatility was comparable to the December 2024 Core Update (Data providers: Google March 2025 core update had similar volatility to the previous update). Some industries (e.g. finance) saw slightly higher-than-average ranking flux, while others (travel, for instance) were less affected in top positions (Data providers: Google March 2025 core update had similar volatility to the previous update) (Data providers: Google March 2025 core update had similar volatility to the previous update). Importantly, impact was site-specific: Google reiterated that even if an update isn’t “widespread,” it can be “100% very big” for sites that are affected (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). Indeed, many webmasters reported substantial ranking swings – both gains and losses – once the update kicked in (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). In short, the March 2025 Core Update broadly re-assessed site content quality and relevance across the index, meaning any site (in any niche) could see changes if Google’s evaluation of its content shifted.

Traffic Drop and Likely Causes

AI Related sites experienced a significant global organic traffic decline that coincided with this core update’s timing (mid/late March 2025). Given the alignment in dates, it’s very likely the core update was a primary cause of the drop, as opposed to a technical glitch or seasonal variance. The nature of the losses – specifically, rankings for keywords involving names of famous people – provides clues to what changed in Google’s evaluation of AI’s content after the update.

  • User-Generated & “Thin” Content: Much of AI Platform’s content (prompts, model pages, etc.) is user-contributed or aggregated. Some pages have minimal text beyond a prompt or model title and a few images. Google’s March 2025 update appeared to target sites with thin or low-value content, rewarding those with more depth and originality (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview). Analysis of the update showed that sites “relying heavily on thin, aggregated, or AI-generated content” saw ranking losses (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview). If your site had many pages with very little unique text (e.g. just a model name and a short description), those pages may now be perceived as “shallow…low-value content” that the algorithm demoted (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview).
  • Aggregated Model Pages (Duplicate Content): Your site’s new AI model pages (including textual inversions, LoRAs, etc.) sometimes pull content from external sources (originally uploaded to HuggingFace/Civitai). This means some model descriptions or metadata might be duplicated from elsewhere. Core updates don’t impose manual penalties, but they re-evaluate which site has the most useful or authoritative content on a topic (March 2025 Google Core Update – What It Means and How to Respond) (March 2025 Google Core Update – What It Means and How to Respond). If your pages were not the original source and added little extra value, Google’s updated ranking system likely preferred the source or other authoritative pages, causing the site to lose those keyword rankings. In effect, scraped or non-original content tends to lose out during core updates (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview) – and the March 2025 update continued Google’s trend of cracking down on content that “doesn’t provide unique value.” (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview)
  • Pages Targeting Famous Names: The site’s reported loss of rankings on queries containing celebrity or public figure names suggests an intent mismatch or trust issue may now be at play. Many prompts and model titles include famous names (e.g. a Stable Diffusion model of “Jane Doe” or a prompt styled after a certain celebrity). Google’s core update likely refined how it handles queries about people. It may be that for searches involving a famous person’s name, Google is now favoring authoritative, contextually relevant content (biographies, news, official pages) over UGC or AI-generated content. A page that simply offers an AI model of “Celebrity X” could be seen as less “helpful or relevant” for a user querying that name, unless the user specifically appended something like “AI image” or “Stable Diffusion.” In other words, Google might interpret a query containing a celebrity name alone as looking for info about that person, not a fan-made AI asset. If sites like PromptHero, Civitai, Freepik etc. previously captured such traffic, the core update’s improved understanding of intent might have curtailed that.

    Furthermore, Google emphasizes E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) for content involving people and entities. AI website’s pages that use famous names are not expert biographies or official content about those figures; they are user-created content loosely related to the figure (an AI rendition). Post-update, Google’s algorithms might consider these pages less trustworthy or useful for name-based queries, especially if the pages lack substantial text explaining the relationship to the person. They could even be interpreted as “name-dropping” for SEO without offering real information about the public figure. While Google hasn’t said “we devalue pages using celebrity names,” the outcome of the rankings suggests these pages lost ground – likely because they fell short on contextual value and authority signals for those name queries.
  • New Video Generation Sections: recent addition of video model categories introduced many new pages (for video model listings, presumably). It’s possible that the site’s architecture and content mix changed enough to impact SEO. For instance, if a lot of new pages were added rapidly, Google’s crawler and index might have re-assessed the site’s content quality in aggregate. Are these new video pages thin or largely empty (e.g., a category page with only a few items or a placeholder)? If so, they could contribute to a lower average content quality across the domain. Also, if internal linking wasn’t adjusted properly, some new pages might not be well-integrated into the site, affecting crawl efficiency or link equity distribution. While the core update was the catalyst, such site changes could amplify the drop by making portions of the site appear underdeveloped. In essence, the core update is likely the primary trigger of the traffic decline, but the site’s content profile – lots of UGC, some duplicate info, pages named after famous entities, and recent expansion into new content areas – made it particularly vulnerable to the update’s quality re-evaluation.

Broader Industry Impact: Similar Sites & Trends

Your site wasn’t alone in seeing declines. The March 2025 Core Update had clear winners and losers, and sites with similar profiles to PromptHero generally fell on the losing side. Industry-wide analysis highlighted a few key patterns that align with what your site experienced:

  • Forums & UGC Platforms Lost Visibility: A notable outcome of this update was the “recalibration” of Google’s treatment of forums and user-generated content sites (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout) (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout). After a period in 2023-24 where Google seemingly boosted forums (calling them “hidden gems”), the March 2025 update reversed course. Many niche forums that had skyrocketed in visibility (gaining hundreds of percent over the last year) plunged back down (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview). For example, DIYChatroom.com and GarageJournal.com – two forums that had benefited massively in previous months – saw their Google traffic nosedive during this update (March 2025 Core Update Analysis & Overview). Even ProBoards (a large forum-hosting platform) saw steep aggregate declines (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout). An SEO strategist, Lily Ray, observed that the “glory days of ‘just be a forum and you’ll rank’ might be coming to an end.” (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout). Smaller UGC sites without Reddit’s authority were largely losers in this update.
  • Quora and Q&A Sites Hit: Quora.com, the massive Q&A platform, was specifically called out as a big loser. Sistrix data showed Quora’s Google visibility dropped roughly –15% in the U.S. market during the update (Google’s March Core Update: Early Observations From Initial Rollout). In the context of hundreds of millions of visits, that is significant. Quora’s content is user-generated and often involves questions about people, products, etc. The fact that even Quora (with its high Domain Authority) lost ground indicates how much Google turned down the dial on UGC content that isn’t deemed high quality or uniquely valuable. Other “answer” or info-aggregator sites also fell – e.g., dictionary and reference sites saw dips (Google Core Update March 2025 – SISTRIX). This suggests Google is favoring depth and expertise over breadth of content.
  • Sites with Programmatic/SEO-First Content Declined: Websites that had created large volumes of pages solely to target keyword permutations got hit. One analysis noted “sites creating large volumes of programmatic pages…designed for SEO rather than user value” saw significant declines (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout). For example, a site (BluettiPower.com) that generated thousands of product pages was mentioned as losing visibility (Google’s March Core Update: Early Observations From Initial Rollout). If you have an expansive library (millions of prompts/models) might appear “programmatic” to Google’s eyes, even if created by actual users, because many pages follow a similar template with limited unique text (prompt, a few tags, maybe an image). It’s the scale and uniformity that might trigger the “thin/programmatic” classification. In short, the update was not kind to mass-produced content. This trend also encompasses “made-for-SEO” aggregator sites. Another example: sites that list free people search info (like truepeoplesearch.com) lost over 60% visibility (Google Core Update March 2025 – SISTRIX).
  • AI-Related Content and AI Overviews: Interestingly, the March 2025 update coincided with a big expansion of Google’s own AI-generated answers (Search Generative Experience/AI Overviews) for certain query types. Data showed a 528% increase in AI Overviews for Entertainment queries during the update window (Google AI Overviews spiked during March 2025 core update). (There were also ~380% increases for restaurant and travel queries (Google AI Overviews spiked during March 2025 core update).) “Entertainment” queries would include searches about movies, actors, characters. If Google’s AI is now answering more of those queries at the top of the page, organic results (especially lower-authority ones) likely saw reduced clicks. The click-through rate for sites ranking for those queries might drop simply because an AI summary is satisfying the user or pushing results further down. So, your site may have been squeezed not only by lower rankings but also by the presence of AI snippets on queries like “[Celebrity] AI art” or similar. SEO experts advise optimizing for entity-driven searches (e.g. have clear context about the person or character on the page) to remain relevant when Google’s AI is summarizing info (Google AI Overviews spiked during March 2025 core update).
  • Authoritative Domains Gained: On the flip side, many high-authority or very content-rich sites gained visibility, emphasizing what Google rewarded. For example, large retail sites with strong content saw improvements (BestBuy, HomeDepot up; whereas some weaker content e-commerce saw drops) (Google Core Update March 2025 – SISTRIX). In the AI space, we might extrapolate that well-established resources or official documentation (e.g., Google’s own AI blogs, academic AI sites, etc.) would likely outrank community content after this update.

SEO Recovery Strategies for your AI Platform

Recovering from a core update requires a thoughtful, long-term approach. Google itself states there are “no specific actions to take to recover” from core updates besides improving your site overall (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). That said, we can derive clear strategy points based on what changed. For a content-heavy, AI-focused platform – which features prompt libraries, model directories, and multimedia (image/video) generation tools – the focus should be on elevating content quality, relevance, and site trustworthiness. Below are actionable SEO strategies tailored to your site’s situation:

  1. Enrich and Differentiate Content: Pages that were hit hardest (e.g. those with just a title like “ – AI Model” and a download link) need more meat on the bone. Bolster each important prompt/model page with unique, value-adding content. For example:
    • Add a detailed description or tutorial: Explain what the model or prompt does, how it was made, and how to use it effectively. If it’s a textual inversion of a celebrity, include a note on what it achieves (e.g. “This model addon teaches Stable Diffusion about the actress’s appearance, allowing you to generate images resembling her in roles from The Lover or Color of Night”) – basically, information that a user would find helpful beyond what’s obvious (Jane March Textual Inversion for Stable Diffusion – PromptHero). This moves the page closer to expert content rather than just a file listing.
    • Include example outputs and usage tips: Show sample images with context in captions or alt text describing the prompt settings. Provide recommended prompts or settings to get the best results from that model. This not only improves user experience but also gives Google more textual content to understand the page’s purpose.
    • Ensure content is original. If a description was taken from elsewhere, rewrite it and expand it. Perhaps have the model uploader or an in-house editor add their own insights. Google rewards unique perspectives and first-hand experience (that’s the “Experience” in E-E-A-T). If you can get the original creators to add commentary or if users who tried the model can leave reviews/tips, that’s great unique content.
    • Address the “famous name” context: If a page uses a famous name, include a disclaimer or context blurb. For instance, “This is an AI model trained on the likeness of [Celebrity]. It is an unofficial fan-created model intended for artistic use.” While this won’t make it an authoritative page about the celebrity, it shows transparency and purpose, which might help align the page with the proper intent (i.e. it’s about an AI interpretation, not claiming to be the official person). Also, by explicitly mentioning it’s fan-made and for a specific purpose, you clarify the user intent the page serves, which might help Google match it to the right queries (e.g. someone searching “[Celebrity] Stable Diffusion model” specifically).
  2. Cull or Consolidate Low-Value Pages: Perform a content audit to find pages that are indexed but very thin or almost duplicate:
    • If there are many prompt pages that consist of one image and a one-line prompt description (with no user engagement or additional info), consider noindexing or removing some of those, especially if they get little to no traffic. It’s better to have 1,000 high-quality prompt pages than 10,000 thin ones in Google’s index. The March 2025 update rewarded sites that trimmed “fluff.” Google’s advice after core updates is to ask if pages are “insightful, comprehensive, or useful” – if not, they might not merit being indexed (paraphrasing Google’s own guidelines (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete) (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout)).
    • Look for overlap: If multiple pages target essentially the same concept (e.g., two very similar anime girl prompts, or multiple pages for the same celebrity model in different versions), merge or canonicalize them where possible. A consolidated page that is richer (maybe one page that lists all versions of a model, with a changelog and combined examples) could perform better than several thin separate pages.
    • For new video model categories, ensure each category page has some introductory content (what the category is about, how to use those video models, etc.). If certain video model pages are just placeholders (e.g. maybe a model name with “coming soon”), keep them off-index until they have real content. This avoids Google encountering too many “empty” pages, which can hurt the site’s overall quality assessment.
  3. Improve Site E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness):
    • Showcase expertise: If any experts or well-known AI artists in the community, have them contribute articles or verify content. For example, an “AI Academy” or blog should feature authoritative guides on prompt engineering, model training, etc. Google’s core updates tend to favor sites that demonstrate expertise in their niche. You could publish content like “How to create safe AI art of real people” or “Ethical considerations of AI models of celebrities” – these would not only target relevant long-tail keywords but also signal that the site is aware and knowledgeable about the domain it operates in. This ancillary content can indirectly lift the site’s perceived authority, which can help all pages rank better.
    • User engagement signals: Encourage users to rate or review prompts and models. If a particular model has dozens of positive comments or a 5-star rating from the community, that indicates to Google (even if indirectly) that it’s valuable content. At the very least, it creates fresh user-generated text on the page (reviews/descriptions) which can improve the page’s quality. However, monitor UGC for spam to ensure it doesn’t backfire.
    • Trust & transparency: Have clear disclaimers about AI-generated content, copyright, and the use of names/likeness. While this is more a legal consideration, it also contributes to trust. Google’s documentation asks “does this site appear trustworthy?” If your site is upfront about how content is created and moderated, it can only help. For instance, a short statement: “All AI models on this site are user-submitted. We require that no model violates copyright or impersonation rules. If you are the subject of a model and wish it removed, contact us.” – such info could be in footer or on relevant pages to show responsibility. This level of transparency might indirectly support E-E-A-T (trustworthiness).
  4. Optimize for Relevant Keywords (and De-optimize for Irrelevant Ones): It’s possible that prior to the update, your site was unintentionally ranking for queries it probably shouldn’t have (like just a celebrity name alone). Post-update, those are gone – which is okay if they were never truly valuable (someone searching just “Celebrity Name” probably wasn’t looking for an AI prompt). The focus now should be to capture the right audience with the right intent:
    • Research and target keywords that combine the subject with the context of AI art. For example, instead of trying to rank for “Gal Gadot” (too broad, and now likely impossible), aim for “Gal Gadot AI art model” or “Gal Gadot stable diffusion prompt.” Long-tail, specific queries are where your site can shine. Ensure page titles and headings reflect that specific intent (e.g. “Gal Gadot – Stable Diffusion Textual Inversion Model for AI Art”). The users who search that are your actual target audience, and by serving them well (with the improvements mentioned above), Google will recognize the relevance.
    • Use internal search data: see what users search for on your site’s own search bar. If many search “celebrity X model”, that’s a sign to have a strong page for it. If some prompt types are trending, create curated lists or spotlight pages (“Top 10 Anime Character Prompts this month”) – this can generate new, high-quality content that targets niche interests.
    • Keep an eye on Google’s AI snapshot behavior. If you notice certain queries now show an AI answer (for example, “How to create a Pixar-style video of Tom Hanks” might trigger an AI overview with steps), then understand that to get clicks for such queries, your content must be even more helpful or target a gap the AI doesn’t fill. Perhaps the AI gives a generic answer, but your site can provide actual examples and downloadable content – something the AI box cannot do. Emphasize those unique offerings in your content so that users have a reason to click through.
  5. Technical SEO & Site Health: Core updates primarily focus on content, but technical issues can hinder even great content. You should:
    • Ensure proper indexing of important pages. Use Google Search Console to check if key pages (prompts/models) dropped out of the index or lost rich snippet features. If the new video pages aren’t indexed, submit sitemaps, etc., but only after improving their content quality.
    • Improve page performance if it’s an issue. Lots of images (prompt results) can slow down pages. Make sure to use proper image compression, lazy loading, etc. Core Web Vitals (loading speed, interactivity, layout stability) can indirectly affect rankings. A faster, smoother site keeps users engaged, which is good for SEO.
    • Fix any crawl errors or broken links. After adding new sections, run a crawl (using Screaming Frog or similar) to ensure no broken links, and that the new sections are linked from the main site. Every important page should be reachable within a few clicks from the homepage or category pages, to spread link equity.
    • Structured data: Consider adding relevant structured data where applicable. For example, if model pages can be seen as software downloads, use appropriate schema. For image content, maybe use ImageObject schema with proper descriptions. While this might not directly boost rankings, it can enhance how Google understands the content. In the future, if Google’s AI or search features index such content, having structured metadata might help your site’s content be featured or at least understood in the right context.
  6. Monitor and Adapt: Use analytics and Google Search Console data in the aftermath of the update:
    • Identify which queries and pages lost the most. This helps validate our hypotheses (e.g., if all the pages that lost ranking contained person names, that’s a strong signal to focus on those pages with the strategies above).
    • Track improvements over time. Core update recoveries often take weeks or months, and sometimes you might not see a rebound until the next core update (Google has noted that sites often don’t fully recover until another core update happens, after they’ve made changes (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete)). So it’s important to implement fixes steadily and be patient. Don’t try quick gimmicks – e.g., simply stuffing more keywords or cloaking content – those won’t work and could worsen things. Instead, steadily build up the quality and monitor if impression and click trends improve gradually.
    • Keep an eye on future Google announcements. If a May 2025 Core Update or another update comes, be ready to assess its impact. Also watch for any ”Helpful Content” updates or spam updates: Google continuously adjusts how it evaluates AI-generated content.
  7. Learn from Competitors and the Community: Investigate how similar sites are doing:

    • Engage with the SEO community. Since you’re aware of this issue, consider posting (anonymously if needed) on forums like Reddit’s r/SEO or Google Search Central Help Community to see if others running AI content sites have tips. Someone might say, for example, “We run a Midjourney prompts blog and we got hit too; after we added 300-word explanations to each prompt, we saw some recovery.” That kind of real-world feedback is gold.
  8. Emphasize Quality Over Quantity: This is a general mantra but very relevant here. Post-update, it appears Google is challenging the sites to also have high quality. So prioritize efforts that improve content quality even if it means fewer pages. For instance, instead of auto-adding 100 new model pages in a week with scant info, add 10 pages but make them excellent. This philosophy will align the site with what core updates target. Remember Google’s advice: “Focus on content that provides the most value to users, and the rankings will follow.” (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout)

By implementing the above strategies, AI generation Sites such as PromptHero can gradually rebuild its organic traffic. The recovery won’t be instant – core updates tend to permanently reshuffle some rankings, and Google wants to see sustained improvements over time (March 2025 Google Core Update – What It Means and How to Respond). However, sites can and do recover from core updates when they address the root issues. In fact, improving the site now not only helps regain lost rankings but could put them in an even stronger position long term (perhaps even outperforming pre-update levels) once Google’s algorithms recognize the enhanced quality.

To recap, Google’s March 2025 Core Update significantly affected AI content by demoting content that the algorithm deemed less helpful – especially user-generated pages with thin content or those targeting entity names without authoritative value. The path to recovery lies in making your site’s content undeniably valuable: richer information, better user experience, and a focus on the niche (AI prompts/models) with authority and depth. As Google’s own guidance says, “there’s nothing special to fix” after a core update – you just need to make your site the best it can be for users (Google March 2025 core update rollout is now complete). By following the strategies above, your AI content can align with Google’s people-first paradigm and hopefully recover its search visibility in the coming months.

Timeline & Public Commentary on the March 2025 Update (for Reference)

These public insights underscore that the March 2025 update was about relevance and quality adjustments, not targeting any one niche. Your site’s drop fits into those patterns, and the recovery recommendations we’ve outlined align with what leading SEO voices have suggested (improve E-E-A-T, remove low-value pages, focus on satisfying user intent) (Google Completes March 2025 Core Update Rollout). By implementing these changes, you can work towards regaining its organic visibility and even future-proof itself for the next core updates.

Sources: