Herrscher_AGGA
V2.0 / Alter:
I've been using Apocryphal for a few days and I love it but it has some problems detailing some suggestive poses and I decided to "update" it, I won't say that the new version is better because I only added poses and some extra shadows.
(By shadows I mean that I improved the female genitals, they have more details and I also recommend using it together with the first version, I think it is a good complement ~)
So... I just did something more seductive? Enjoy the lora ~
V1.0:
Hmm... Sexy?
The thing is that I fell in love with CuteLatte and did a few generations but I finally finished training this style and well, it's sexy, I have no idea how to explain it. XD
Let's say CutteLatte was my second CuteMaster (I mean, I've used them quite a bit).
CuteLatte has a beautiful realism that if you combine it with the chromatic aberration is a pretty cool style (I was actually surprised that that will happen)... but we didn't come to talk about that, the issue here is that I needed to empty my pc (again ) and I was thinking of giving a little push to my past generations before killing them and that is apocryphal, it is made with many styles that I made and I liked, new and old, what does it matter, I recovered several gigabytes and I am happy with the results.
By the way, for some reason a lot of my styles work better with Euler a (I've actually only tried it on that and dpm++ a karras, the thing is, they work well there and it's faster).
Popularity
Info
Version IL | V2 (Tester_G4): 1 File
About this version: IL | V2 (Tester_G4)
This version includes Metanoia data.
Off-topic: So... my idea was to adjust a Lora to be more compatible with a model, for now I've only tested it with Loras trained with Illustrious base adjusted for WAI-NSFW-Illustrious v12, what happens is that I had to format the PC and I lost a lot of datasets and I've been wondering if I could convert or adjust a Lora to be more compatible with another model (checkpoint), I've also tried it with PDXL Loras and I must admit that it improves the quality of the Lora.
Let me explain, among all my experiments I thought about converting a PDXL Lora to Illustrious, to do so I needed to adjust it to a Lora compatible with a checkpoint that is merged with PDXL (I did this to add layers of Illustrious improving the quality of the Lora and yes, if you do it wrong you will generate a Lora heavier than a checkpoint that you could even use as such but that was not what I was looking for).
12 Versions
Go ahead and upload yours!
